News and Media
In a 31-page opinion issued by the office of the Attorney General, Jeff Sessions further limited who is qualified to receive asylum in the United States.
The decision disqualifies people fleeing from domestic violence or other “non-governmental” violent crimes from being eligible to be granted a refuge in the US. Women running away from abuse from Central America and other places will be cut off from the US as a place to find safety.
“Generally, claims by aliens pertaining to domestic violence or gang violence perpetrated by non-governmental actors will not qualify for asylum,” Sessions said in the document.
This latest decision is just the latest move in an overall policy of limiting the immigration of undocumented people to the country. Just last month the Trump administration upped the ante by beginning to federally prosecute all people suspected of crossing the border illegally. This opened the door to the separation of families, especially children from their mothers or fathers, during the court proceedings.
People seeking refuge must prove they have a credible fear of persecution in their home country. In addition, that fear must be based on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. Four years ago, the Board of Immigration Appeals decided that “married women in Guatemala who are unable to leave their relationship” made up a social group under the standard. That helped women who were running away from domestic violence in Central America.
Sessions said the 2014 decision did not have the “rigorous analysis” needed to establish a precedent, enabling him to bypass the ruling.
“The mere fact that a country may have problems policing certain crimes effectively — such as domestic violence or gang violence — or that certain populations are more likely to be victims of crime, cannot itself establish an asylum claim,” Sessions wrote.
Activist hedge fund JANA Partners, together with the California State Teachers’ Retirement System, sent a letter to Apple, Inc. asking that they take on some of the responsibility for children who spend hours each day on their smartphones.
The open letter asks Apple to ‘think differently about kids,’ in particular, the letter asserts that “there is a clear need for Apple to offer parents more choices and tools to help them ensure that young consumers are using your products in an optimal manner.” Collectively, JANA and Caltstrs own about $2 billion in shares of Apple, the largest company in the United States.
The letter is footnoted with study after study pointing out many things that are obvious to American parents raising children today. The studies show that:
• 67% of teachers believe the number of students negatively distracted by digital technologies in the classroom is climbing.
• 75% of teachers believe their students’ ability to focus is declining.
• The risk for suicide goes up as the number of hours spent on electronic devices per day increases.
• Teens that spend 5 or more hours per day on devices are 51% more likely to get less than 7 hours of sleep at night instead of the recommended 9 hours. Lack of sleep can lead to obesity and high blood pressure.
• Children who spent 5 days at an outdoor camp without devices did better on tests for empathy than children in a control group.
• A survey by the American Psychological Association showed that 58% of parents worry about the influence of social media on the physical and mental health of their children; 48% say that they have a “constant battle” with their children over limiting screen time; and 58% say they feel like their children are “attached” to their devices.
Michael Rich of the Center on Media and Child Health at Boston’s Children’s Hospital, Jean M. Twenge, author of the book iGen and a professor and psychologist at San Diego State University, and Sting and his wife Trudie Styler, got together to look at the scientific evidence and confront Apple with it in this letter:
“We believe there is a clear need for Apple to offer parents more choices and tools to help them ensure that young consumers are using your products in an optimal manner,” the group states.
The letter asks Apple to implement some concrete measures to address the problem, including:
• Creating jobs at Apple as well as to fund outside efforts to study the issue.
• Creating user tools and options that can help parents limit or better monitor their children’s screen time.
• Educating parents as to why Apple is offering more choices and including the research that went into developing those choices to help parents make more informed decisions.
• Bringing a high-level executive to Apple who will monitor the issue and report on the company’s progress in dealing with it, as they are already doing with environmental issues and supply chain issues.
The letter is signed by Barry Rosenstein, managing partner at JANA Partners, and Anne Sheehan, director of Corporate Governance for the California State Teachers’ Retirement System.
Democratic Senator Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota is a supporter of protecting the Second Amendment. Explaining to an audience at a Los Angeles gathering to tape a “Women Rule” podcast, Heitkamp said that in North Dakota gun ownership rights is akin to abortion rights for much of the population.
“I think sometimes people have a diminished sense of the Second Amendment,” she told the audience.
She acknowledged that her views are not the mainstream for women associated with more liberal causes and the Democratic Party, saying that her opinions might “make everybody kind of groan who sees the tragedy that’s happened in this country, as it relates to gun violence.
”Despite her audience’s negative response, she continued to defend her point of view.
Saying that she has a “real kind of visceral reaction to the lack of appreciation—or understanding—about how people feel about the Second Amendment, and how people feel about restrictions on the Second Amendment,” she compared her feelings to those of people opposed to restrictions on abortion rights.
“Restrictions on your reproductive rights — think about how strongly you feel about evaluating those restrictions. That’s how strongly people in North Dakota and Indiana and other places feel about restricting their Second Amendment.
”In a “red state” that has one of the highest rates of gun ownership in the country and which voted overwhelmingly for Donald Trump, it is no surprise that Heitkamp holds these views in contradistinction to the platform of her party. Despite her position on gun control, she still won her seat by only a 1 percent margin.
She is against expanded background checks and against restrictions on gun ownership by people with mental health issues, saying both are unconstitutional restrictions of civil liberties, similar to allowing unrestricted search and seizures.
Her solutions to the gun violence epidemic are the “no fly, no buy” bill introduced by Senator Susan Collins, Republican of Maine, which prevent people on federal no-fly lists from purchasing guns; and to “harden” security in schools.
“We issued a report on what schools should do in terms of drills, and hardening schools,” said Heitkamp, who was North Dakota’s attorney general at the time of the attack. “And all of these schools have done that, but yet it hasn’t prevented these kinds of shootings.”
“I think we need to go back and take a look at institutions,” she said. “We need to go back and take a look at how, where we missed the mark on so much of this. But I think if we only focus on guns, I think we will miss the opportunity to really fix this problem.”
Last Saturday saw hundreds of thousands of protestors joining together to demand sensible gun control laws which will once and for all reign in what seems like a terrifying epidemic of mass shootings of children in their schools.
Inspired by the most recent heinous crime, the shooting to death of 17 high school students and their teachers at Marjory Stoneman Douglas high school in Parkland, Florida, the “March for Our Lives” gathering was a lesson in democracy that seems to be attracting some attention from lawmakers.
Not only was a mass protest planned and executed, but youth voter registration and crash courses on activism and public policy are being developed and sponsored. While hundreds of thousands of people turned out in Washington, DC, there were also 800 related marches taking place all over the United States.
Frustration has been the basic feeling of gun control activists as the number of dead from mass school shootings continued to grow until something changed as a result of the Parkland massacre. Paying the National Rifle Association little or no heed, high school students decided enough is enough.
“The adults haven’t been able to make these changes so the kids are going to show us how it’s done,” Parkland student Alex Wind said.
One student who took bullets to both legs during the Parkland shooting, Samantha Fuentes, read a poem she wrote about the attack: “I was crying tears and blood at the same time,” Fuentes read to the audience. She then stopped, bent over and threw up behind the podium.
A few moments later, after she recovered a bit she declared: “I just threw up on international television and it feels awesome!”
Another student, Emma Gonzalez, also from Parkland and one of the more recognizable faces from the attack, read the names of the Parkland victims while crying. As she took a long pause the entire crowd fell completely silent, with only the sound of cameras’ shutters and far distant sirens in the air. Students on stage and in the crowd began to chant “Never again!”
Another pause by Gonzalez lasted a full 6 minutes and 20 seconds, the amount of time the shooter, Nikolas Cruz, took to shoot down his 17 mortally wounded victims and 14 others wounded less seriously.
“This is what democracy — looks like!” the crowd of protestors chanted during the rally.